Ricky Buchanan ([info]rickybuchanan) wrote,
@ 2006-08-15 14:19:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Guest blog entry - Disability and "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest"
The following was written in email by a friend of mine. And she kindly gave me permission to post it.

This is about disability issues in the new movie "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest", and well worth reading. If anyone wants to link to this, please do - I would love to see how it is viewed by others.

I have not seen the movie as it is not available on DVD yet, but I don't mind spoilers at all, so say anything you want. Comments are good!

I won't give away any of the plot, since I know you will probably
have to wait to see "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest" in
video. But I would like your opinion on the disability issue. It
was the only point I didn't like.

In the first movie, as you will recall, Captain Jack Sparrow was
portrayed as perpetually wobbly. The viewer at first assumed that
he must be always tipsy, except that he remained this way through
long periods of unavoidable abstinence, and in fact was rarely ever
shown to take a drink. Eventually it came out that when his crew
mutinee'd, they tied him to a mast and left him in the broiling sun
to die. This caused brain damage.

However, in the second movie he is shown swigging from a bottle at
every turn, with the obvious intention of portraying him as
chronically drunk. This is particularly odd considering how he
mocks an old rival for having become a toss-pot in his defeat.
Have people complained about "laughing at the disabled"? No doubt,
then, others will soon complain about glorifying alcoholism!

Because that's what was really going on--the character of Jack
Sparrow glorified a disabled person. Every time he lost his
balance he recovered with such panache that it was a delight to
behold. He portrayed a man unconquerable even by the betrayals of
his own body. More than that, he took on life as a swaying dance
with his own imperfections, physical or otherwise, accepting
himself, unashamed. He made it seem feasible to consider that
anyone can be graceful!

But that, apparently, was not politically correct. They traded
that wonderful image for a mere drunk. We are all supposed to
inspire the able-bodied with earnest efforts to be as "normal" as
possible, and take it all very, very seriously. Disability
shouldn't be dashing.

But pirate tales have always portrayed the dashing disabled, from
peglegged Long John Silver to the elegantly sinister Captain Hook.
Indeed, there is a boating club for the disabled in San Francisco
whose emblem is a peglegged, hook-handed, eyepatched pirate.
Pirates are, by nature, tougher than their handicaps yet not
particularly interested in inspiring anyone. They're too busy
living to the hilt. They sneer at the blows of misfortune and
carry on outrageously in defiance of death, disability, or
damnation. Most literature and drama portray the disabled as
artificially angelic--so sweet, so virtuous from the inability to
sin, so tragic. Pirates spit in the eye of that portrayal--they'll
find a way to do what they please, and if it doesn't suit you
they'll invite you to walk the plank.

Give me back my sun-dazzled Captain Jack and lose the drunkard!


(Post a new comment)


[info]splodgenoodles
2006-08-15 04:30 am UTC (link)
Hey, who wrote that? That's a damn fine piece. I'd not thought of the pirate thing that way - she's absolutely right.

I'd rather like to link or post to it in my own blog, and probably add it to my memories, because I've been pondering the whole thing about portrayal of disabilities lately. Could you please ask if I may?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Dreamdeer
(Anonymous)
2006-08-15 04:30 pm UTC (link)
You have my permission to quote it. This is Dreamdeer, and I wrote it. My real name is Dolores J. Nurss.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]blarglefiend
2006-08-15 04:38 am UTC (link)
I figured he was drinking so much because he was having trouble with his conscience. It's one thing to be a pirate and steal stuff, it's entirely another to con someone who is supposed to be a friend -- someone who has risked a hell of a lot to save your skin -- into taking your place as an undead servant!

He went from dashing antihero to scumbag pretty rapidly. Wouldn't you want a few drinks to try to forget that?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-08-15 04:23 pm UTC (link)
Dreamdeer here.

You make a good point, Blarglefiend! I should have considered that. (Yes, I wrote it--flaws and all!) I was probably way too harsh on the second movie, but I do get worked up about the occasional misapplication of political correctness messing things up for the disabled with the intention of doing us good. Maybe, then, sometimes I see it where it isn't there.

But pc caution does sometimes mess things up. For instance, one of my conditions is narcolepsy. I was checking out this information packet you're supposed to give friends and relatives to understand, and the very first thing it says is that Narcolepsy is no laughing matter--it is a serious condition. Bullcakes! Every job I've ever had where folks got a good laugh out of the absurd situations I might fall asleep in gave me the chance to prove myself. They paid attention to how much work I actually got done, not how often I fell asleep. In contrast, every job that took narcolepsy terribly seriously and spoke of it in hushed tones soon fired me, telling me with great regret that they did not think I was up to the task at hand, no matter how I tried to point out that I worked faster between sleep seizures and actually got more done (that was before the ADA made them subject to lawsuits if they couldn't prove my disability actually interfered with my work.) Taking it too seriously led them to obsess on it. A good belly laugh now and then relieved the tension and let me do my job.

Or how about the very word "disabled"? Why has that become more permissible than handicapped? Whose idea was that? You handicap a golfer who's too good. You disable a bomb. Which would you rather be associated with?

Discussing my various anomalies in hushed voices, with terrible seriousness, soon leads to embarrassment, which leads to life behind closed doors in back rooms, isolated, hushed clean out of sight. I would much rather, pirate-like, break out and be seen, gaudy, flawed, and free, even if I collapse in plain sight and scare the tourists.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]stephantom
2006-08-15 04:41 am UTC (link)
I feel like there is something ironic about the fact that I got to this post by means of the f-list of a person whose f-list I read for "House, M.D." fanfiction. Most literature and drama portray the disabled as
artificially angelic--so sweet, so virtuous from the inability to
sin, so tragic. Pirates spit in the eye of that portrayal--
as does the limping Greg House. (Who actually has some Jack Sparrow-like mannerisms... hmm...)

It's an interesting point, about Jack, but it hadn't actually occurred to me before that Jack was brain-damaged. Well, ok, the possibility had occured to me, but more as just a possibility, not as "Oh, of course that's what they intended." I also didn't notice his drinking being any more prominent in the movie than it was in the first one - that is, it was a big part of his character all along. The only scene I can think of in the second movie actually that really is about Jack being a drunk seems to be there just to utilize a popular line from the first movie ("Why is the rum always gone?" as a throwback to "But why is the rum gone?!") So I don't agree that it was necessarily a calculated move to portray Jack as a drunk and not brain-damaged.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]waitingman
2006-08-15 01:24 pm UTC (link)
I agree... the scene where Jack stumbles & uses the "...rum gone..." line, is one of many references to the first movie. In fact, when he stumbles, I thought, at first, it was because the ship had lurched sideways, not him... Correct me if my memory leads me astray, but there are no more scenes of Jack drinking in the 2nd movie than there were in the 1st one ~ remember the time he's stranded on the island with Elizabeth??

As to the random shifting of his moral compass in the new film, well... "PIRATE!!!"

And while we're on the subject of random moral compasses & the disabled... gotta love Greg House!!!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]colinportnuff
2006-08-15 05:48 am UTC (link)
I did not see any of this. I thought it was just a moderately enjoyable yarn. Frankly I enjoyed the first one more, but the second one was OK. I did not consider either of them from the viewpoint of portrayal of disability. I'm not the essay doesn't have merit, just that I didn't see it.

(Reply to this)


[info]ltlpengy
2006-08-15 07:07 am UTC (link)
Brilliant piece of writing - and when you consider that Johhny Depp apparently used Ozzie Osbourne as his template (sorry -can't think of the right word) its really spot on, as he's admitted to 'damaged' through his drug and alcohol abuse.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reddragdiva
2006-08-15 08:39 am UTC (link)
He used Keith Richards as his template!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ltlpengy
2006-08-15 11:47 pm UTC (link)
oops - close but no banana! Love your icon!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]redcountess
2006-08-15 08:03 am UTC (link)
I'd never thought of the disability of pirates before, but as others have pointed out (I still haven't seen the film yet, so have an open mind), Jack's drinking in this film, doesn't negate that he is disabled. I have shared a house with someone with a serious disability (cerebral palsy) who drank.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-08-17 03:02 pm UTC (link)
(Dreamdeer)

I have to say I love your pirate-kitty icon! How appropriate!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]emmersonne
2006-08-15 09:39 pm UTC (link)
Oh I love this film, seen the old one 8 times and the new one three times.

I think Jack's disability is only paid less attention in the second film because his personal problems (I won't spoil the film for you but he spends a lot of time wrestling with his conscience and exploring traumatic experiences of the past) are the main focus for his character. His increased alcholism seems to me to be a crutch to cope with the past coming back to haunt him. (you say you don't mind spoilers at all so here goes) He betrays Will to he death in order to escape the past and the burden gets worse as the film goes on.

(Reply to this)


[info]earwigmc
2006-09-04 12:42 pm UTC (link)
really interesting to think about. i saw the film a little while ago now, and think i need to go see it again, and consider it in relation to the above post/the above post in relation to it afresh. i can't recall enough to comment properly, tho the post prompted me to remember that yes, he was drinking a lot more than the first film... but i think a few of the comenters have got a point about conscience...

tho in the first film too he does have a penchant for rum... and i just assigned the drinking as a pirate thing.

i really like the pirate=dashing-disabled thoughts..."carry on outrageously in defiance of death, disability, or damnation" *grins*

i found my way to your journal, via your website, after a friend pointed me to your tshirts *smile*

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…